A 'Sweet' Gem

I have been reading ‘Sweet’, the novel by Tracy Ryan watcher the dvdrip watch bowfinger in divx

download perfect stranger movie

about the relationships between a WA Baptist pastor in the 80′s and 3 female members of his congregation. Essentially it explores the rather subtle issue of codependence and how this develops between a pastor and congregation. I don’t know how wide an appeal this book will have, but for those of us in leadership roles it ought to be read and reflected on.

‘Cody’s’ journey has been of particular interest to me as she is a young Christian in the process of questioning her faith and wondering about its foundation. Her place of certainty is not Jesus or the scriptures, but William her pastor and she is struggling to come to terms with the fact that all is not a cut and dried as he would once have had her believe. Still his power is great…

Here’s an excerpt I found very challenging. After reflecting on Paul, the young man who drew Cody to faith, she goes on to think of William:

But with William it was the other way around, he had not attracted Cody to God. He had simply come to stand in the way of her notion of God. She had got caught up before she knew it, swayed to his way of seeing things somehow, like Patty Hearst, that syndrome where you form a dependence on your captor, your torturer. Was he really her captor? No-one forced her to be there. Doing what she would not do, and not doing what she would do, as it said in the book of Romans.

She thought of Jane Eyre wild wild west dvd download , which she had read at school. The chapter before Jane’s wedding, the wedding that fell apart:

He stood between me and every thought of religion, as an eclipse intervenes between man and the broad sun. I could not in those days, see God for His creature, of whom I had made an idol.

Is it just me or are those challenging words for those in local church leadership?

It makes me ask where is the line between protecting the sheep and abusing the sheep?

It causes me to wonder how much of my own needs to be needed and admired by those I lead get in the way of doing what’s best for both of us. As I read the novel I think William is (so far) quite oblivious to his controlling ways and personal needs. He doesn’t come across as a tyrant and yet his subtle exertion of control over these women is possibly even more destructive than if it were overt.

As a person who has led a larger church I have experienced the destructive side of the Jane Eyre quote as people have expected me to be someone I simply could never be and as I have used that influence to get things done. It is a strange and sometimes disturbing relationship that takes place between needy pastor and needy congregation member.

If I have learnt anything it is that those of us in leadership must be secure in our own identity if we are to risk leading others. Insecure leaders are the very worst as they make all sorts of demands stemming from their own need to be loved and valued and not from healthy motives.

I am pondering what makes a person secure rather than insecure. I was originally reflecting that it was a function of maturity – that as we get older we need the approval of others less – but that is not universally true…

Perhaps it has something to do with coming to grips with the greyness of the world and our frailty in making sense of it. William continues to see most issues in a strong shade of black or white and it is his undoing. I tend to think that as we get older we should be able to determine what issues are clear cut – and they get fewer as you get older – and which are grey, but maybe not all can do this.

I haven’t finished the book, but I imagine Cody will end up getting disillusioned with this brand of church and will leave. She will be guilt ridden for her ‘betrayal’, but will struggle on for the sake of integrity. She will become one of the ‘churchless faith’ Christians who still want to follow Jesus and who still believe, but who have not found a place to live a more questioning and reflective expression of discipleship.

Share

"Sweet" as…

I am currently reading ‘Sweet’ a novel I discovered on Nathan’s blog download don t look now bedtime stories dvd download

blood car online

and finding it very interesting – partly because it is written about a scene I have been so intricately involved with for the last 34 years, but partly because it addresses the ongoing issues of co-dependency that plague both church leader and church member. By that I mean, the people needing a pastor and pastor needing to be needed.

Nathan summarises the story well with these words:

Tracy Ryan’s third novel, Sweet, is the story of three women caught in the thrall of a manipulative pastor of a conservative Baptist church in the outer-suburbs of Perth circa 1986. The Reverend William King is a complex figure, genuinely caring but always controlling.

Cody is seventeen and has just lost her brother in a car accident. In her grief the church offers her a degree of purpose and meaning. Yet she seems to fall into Christianity, rather than converting through conviction. Soon, William is pressuring her to give her testimony in front of the church, the story of her conversion from the darkness of ‘Romanism’. But this story he is trying to impose on her doesn’t ring true; her nominally Roman Catholic background is neutral in her memory.

Kylie is a young mother whose husband Mick is frequently away shearing. Her Baptist neighbours take an interest in her and babysit her children; soon she finds herself sucked into the church. Mick is unimpressed by her heavy involvement and she is torn between the church and him.

Carol has been a Christian much longer and her story is about the disintegration of her externally perfect Baptist family. As problems with her daughter and husband arise, she begins to realise that life isn’t as simple as her faith has taught her.

If you have been part of WA Baptist churches over the last 20 years then the scenery will be very familiar and like me you might even find yourself wondering who the ‘Reverend William King’ is…There is too much insider knowledge for this not to be based somewhat on personal experience.

So far it hasn’t been an overly negative portrayal of either the Baptists of the time or of William King (although there are definite issues with both).

Sometimes our history can look so embarrassing in hindsight, while in the moment it can actually appear to make perfect sense. The ‘separateness’ of the cultures is probably what strikes me most strongly at the moment, possibly because this has been my own significant shift. It was the era when we stayed away from sinners except for purposes of overt evangelism.

If you are easily offended by a few pretty graphic sex scenes then its not the book for you, otherwise you will probably find it a good read.

It is well written, easy to follow and yet at the same time has some substance for those of us in churches and ministry. I think it would be an interesting book for those in the ‘pastoral care’ field to use in their training courses as it would shine the spotlight on the complications of being both pastor and church member.

I am just over half way thru and looking forward to the rest!download human traffic divx

Share

What’s the Opposite of Deja Vu?

If dejavu is feeling like you’ve done something before then I am wondering what the term is to describe the feeling of anticipating doing something. Maybe its ‘premonition’!

As an avid reader I have recently joined the new Brighton estate book club, meeting monthly on Monday nights. I was very much looking forward to it but then heard it was a group of 9 women and me…

Now I like women… but even to me that sounds like something of a scary group to be part of.

Then tonight Danelle and I watched the Jane Austen book club and now I am very very scared… :)

image.jpg

Seriously, there is a Brighton book club starting soon and if you’re a bloke it’d be great to have you there. And if you haven’t seen the Jane Austen Book Club then its good for a light hearted Saturday evening – a creative story line and happy endings all round, without feeling like you need to vomit.

Share

Simple Church?

simplechurch.jpg My session at our Forge Re-imagine Learning Day this weekend revolves around the concepts presented in Simple Church by Thom Rainer and Eric Geiger. We are exploring what churches look like that have structures that facilitate healthy missional engagement and discipleship.

Duncan Brown who is about to be the new pastoral team leader at Peninsula Baptist Church in Vic (Mornington) is our key presenter and I am the ‘filler’…

What I liked about ‘SC’ is the way they distilled the essence of a healthy church into 4 distinct components and offered principles and a framework rather than a you beaut model.

However the further I went along the more I saw that while it may be ‘simple‘ it certainly wouldn’t be easy to do what they suggest.

The 4 core principles of ‘Simple Church’ are:

1. Clarity – because ‘people cannot embrace the ambiguous’. We need to decide what is is we are seeking to do and how we are seeking to do it. It needs to be clear and easily communicable so that people can ‘get it’. Clarity will enable measurability and accountability to what we put our hands to

2. Movement – Rhainer argues that we need to sequentially move people thru discipleship stages to help them increase in their
level of commitment. He states strongly that in churches where discipleship and mission is effective there is a ‘sequential / linear’ process that is followed. The sequence is not terribly imaginative being Sunday gathering – smaller groups – service. And I am not all that convinced that messy people follow linear processes very well either.

However his point is that we get ‘bottle-necks’ and need to clear them if people are to grow. Usually the bottle neck is the Sunday gig and we need to help people get beyond that. I’d like to see some more fluidity and flexibility in this dimension as it currently feels rather strait jacketish

3. Alignment – simply put this involves aligning all aspects of church life so that the same process occurs in each ministry area. It avoids groups competing and sending mixed messages to people. There is some real wisdom in this. Having been a youth pastor I know we developed our own vision statement, processes and systems alongside the main church, but it actually subverted the other congregation as we sought to develop our own identity.

Some will find Rhainer restrictive here, but the value is in harnessing a team that all wants to do the same things and not having competing agendas. Of course the question that arises is ‘what do we do with the disparate and dissenting voices?’ This hasn’t always been a strength of churches that are pursuing a vision. Its usually get on board or go somewhere else.

4. Focus – the point of this element is to eliminate any unnecessary activity and be very careful about adding anything new to the calendar. Often churches seem to develop and allow anything to happen so long as someone runs it and doesn’t ask for money. This element requires a particularly cohesive and focused leadership team to be able to implement and stay on track.

In all of these elements communication is crucial and the success of a church seeking to implement these elements will probably hinge on the degree to which they are able to get the message out. I guess we could call that good leadership!

While the book seeks to encourage churches to simplify, I am not quite sure where a missional involvement in the local community and everyday life fits. There was little if any talk of mission while there was talk of serving within the church.

Maybe I just notice these things more these days…

So you don’t need to come to my session now…

Share

Sayers is Back

sayers_3494.jpgMark Sayers is back in blogdom and throwing out some juicy thoughts on gospel and culture over here.

Mark is one of those blokes I never tire listening to so if you have an interest in 21st C western culture and how we engage in it as missionaries this blog is essential reading – especially for Aussies.

And while we’re on Mark his first book is now out and there is an official booklaunch in Melbourne to celebrate it.

‘The Trouble With Paris’ Book Launch
Sunday June 15th 3:30pm – 4:30pm
@ the Red East Space: Level 1, 878 Whitehorse Rd, Box Hill
Cost $0

You can buy the book at the launch for $15.00 or you can head over to Amazon and get it there

paris.jpg

The book gets an eclectic range of endorsements:

“These are great tools for everyone trying to find the Way, the Truth, and the Life in a world of shortcuts, deception, and death. Amid the noise and seductions of our culture, may Mark’s work help us to be both relevant and peculiar to this chaotic world. May we raise up a generation of radical nonconformists with everything that is wrong in the world, a generation that turns the world upside down so that it aligns with the Kingdom of God.”

Shane Claiborne, Author of The Irresistible Revolution: Living as an Ordinary Radical

Mark has something fresh to say about what can kill your soul and who can salvage it.

John Ortberg, Pastor and Author, Menlo Park Presbyterian Church

Mark Sayers is something of a spiritual genius who is able to both name and diagnose the angst of an entire generation caught up in the web of consumerism and hyperreality. This book is laced with the kind of wise and prophetic insights that take the reader to the heart of some of the most important issues of our age. Nothing less than a clue to the spiritual healing of a generation lies hidden in the pages of this book.

Alan Hirsch Author of The Forgotten Ways and author (with Michael Frost) of The Shaping of Things To Come. Alan is founding director of Forge Mission Training Network

Mark Sayers’ new book The Trouble with Paris is outstanding. Well informed, insightful, articulate, and down to earth are just a few thoughts that come to mind when describing this tour de force. Sayers has a unique ability to put his finger on the pulse of contemporary culture and Christianity, and he proves to be a capable guide through the thickets of that which is counterfeit and fake. Today we’re submersed in the media driven and publicity shaped hollow promises of hyperreality, which are driving us to embrace the unreal and consequently an impoverished spirituality. Reading this powerful book will help us get back to the real and lead us to a rediscovery of our spiritual bearings for the present and the future.

In working with Swiss L’Abri for over twenty years now, my take on this book
is that it’s exactly what we need to get our priorities aligned with living in God’s reality, instead of trying and failing to make it up as we go along. Hyperreality is deceptively addictive, and if we are to touch a generation of people for the sake of Christ, it is books like Sayers’ The Trouble with Paris that will help pave the way. Highly recommended.

Dr. Gregory J. Laughery, Author of Living Spirituality: Illuminating the Path and teacher with L’Abri Fellowship, Switzerland

Its great to see Mark’s brilliance recognised and now in print. If you haven’t come across him before then I’d encourage you to check out both blog and book!

Share

Breath by Tim Winton

breath_australian-cover_cover.jpg

Danelle bought me this novel for my birthday and I finished it last night.

As anyone who has read this blog for a while would know, I am a Winton fan – possibly even an addict – and love virtually everything he has written. So when I heard this book was coming out I was frothing at the mouth with anticipation. I often feel like Winton writes what I would have written if i were a genuinely good writer. he says things like I wish I could. I feel in tune with his writing and the whole energy of his books.

However right off the bat there were a few things about Breath that knocked me a little. The first was the size of the book. At 213 pages it is hardly an epic and I knew I’d probably feel ripped off by the end. I would have just become engaged with the characters and the whole thing would end. And knowing Danelle paid $42.00 for it I was determined to get every penny worth out of it.

The second was that it was actually about surfing. This might surprise those who know my love of the surf, but what I have loved about Winton is the way the ocean and the West Ozzie landscape has formed the backdrop to his stories and in many ways has framed his writing. To move it to centre stage left me a little anxious. I guess I was wondering if the focus on surfing itself might actually be too obvious. People have often comnpared full scale surf movies to pornos – a dog-lame storyline hung around some exciting visuals. Now Winton is way too good for this, and his descriptions of surfing were as beautiful as any I have read, but I was still concerned.

Sadly it only took two evenings of slow deliberate reading to reach the final chapter. Now we have to wait another 4 years for his next novel.

Perhaps it was a self fulfilling prophecy, but my anxiety about surfing as the centrepiece had some merit. As much as the descriptions of Pikelet and Loonie’s first ventures out into the surf brought back wonderful memories, I just didn’t find the whole surf scene as potent as much of his other writing.

The guts of the story is about two young blokes who love surfing, and who find a ‘mentor’ in Sando who takes them out to surf humungous waves and stretches them to the limit. It traces the relationship between the boys the man and his wife and the twists and turns life takes in it all.

While the story itself revolves around surfing and the associated relationships and adventure, (kind of like a quality version of ‘Surfs Up’), the deeper theme of the book is powerful and worth a bit more reflection.

In essence it revolves around the desire for a life that is extraordinary in the middle of the mundaneness and blandness that forms most of our experience. The novel starts with Pikelet in his 40′s and now a paramedic attending a teenage death. While considered by some to be a suicide (hanging), Pikelet knows that it was actually accidental death by asphyxiation in search of a sexual rush. he knows because he has been there before…

Enter the idea of ‘breath’.

Much of life really is as mundane and ordinary as breathing in and out, which propels us to seek out climactic experiences – ways of encountering something more – or as Winto puts it “rebelling against the monotony of drawing breath’ . In many ways this is what the boys do as they surf bigger and bigger waves and as they seek new experiences, hyperventilating their way to longer and longer times under the ocean’s surface. Without wanting to spoil it, the story explores this theme of what ‘extraordinary’ looks like in a world where most of us need to live in the ‘ordinary’.

Loonie keeps chasing the extraordinary while Pikelet lives with his ongoing frustration with his own ordinariness. Somehow in the midst of the tumult that is Piklet’s life he learns to live with his own ‘insignificance’ while Loonie dies as a crazy feral always on the run and never content. Its probably no surprise that Pikelet finds some joy in this life as a paramedic where peak adrenalin experiences may remind him of his days in the ocean.

The metaphor of breath as that which gives life, is played out in the extremes of the sexual asphyxiation scenes and the mega hold downs in surfing and these are contrasted with the rhythmic, predictable, everydayness of simple inhaling and exhaling.

The messiness of life is contrasted with the sheer beauty of surfing. As Winton writes: “‘how strange it was to see men do something beautiful. Something pointless and elegant, though nobody saw or cared.”

I think Winton actually commends the more ‘ordinary’ Pikelet who gets left behind by Sando and Loonie in their mutual pursuit of bigger adrenalin rushes. Pikelet lives where most of us live. He refuses to surf the terrifying ‘Nautilus’ with Loonie and Sando and is considered something of a coward, by them and himself. He struggles with his failure and his own demons of insecurity. he isn’t the ‘hellman’ he wishes he were.

Welcome to the world… But the fact that does he struggle is possibly his redeeming feature. He is honest and real, fragile and broken.

Loonie and Sando appear as superheros but in reality their adventures only serve to mask their own brokenness and struggle.

If anything the book is a testimony to the importance of being content with living an ordinary life. At least an honest divx sidewalks of new york ordinary life.

Maybe not my favourite Winton, but still a very good read, if you’re not easily disturbed.

This little clip is from the promo website and is very good, if only for its depictions of the south west Oz coastline.


Tim Winton reads from ‘Breath’ from Virginia on Vimeo.

Share

Did We Get It Wrong? “The New Conspirators” sets some cats among the pigeons….

newconspirators.jpg

While we were away over Easter I read my copy of The New Conspirators, the latest book by Tom Sine (who will be speaking at the Forge Festival in 2 weekends time and then in Perth after that for a few days)

I don’t have time at the moment for an indepth review, but I will highly recommend this book to anyone exploring discipleship and mission in a changing world.

He surveys what is going on around the world in missional incarnational ventures and then offers some insights into where he thinks we are headed in the coming years. I didn’t warm to the book immediately, as it begins with a fairly generic overview of the fact that the world is changing. However the more I read the better it got.

Right at the start Sine asks what if we got some aspects of our faith wrong over the years?…

- Did we get eschatology wrong?
- Did we get what it means to be a disciple wrong?
- Did we get what it means to be a steward wrong?
- Did we get what it means to be the church wrong?
- Did we get what it means to do mission wrong?

As you might guess his conclusion is… ‘yeah… maybe we did…’

Because Tom is an older guy, (yes – its all relative), has been around a while and his previous books have been widely read he is pretty hard to dismiss. This is not a young punk on a dummy spit, but a thoughtful practitioner asking serious questions. (And yes – they are big questions!)

The New Conspirators is readable without being shallow and has solid depth without being scholarly.

I reckon you should add it to your pile of must reads for 2008.

Share

Pagan Christianity

pagan1.jpg

I never read this book in its first incarnation, so I thought it’d be well worth a look this time around.

I am about half way thru and finding it a decent read, even if it does caricature the established church somewhat. I find this practice somewhat tiring and attimes have considered just putting it back on the shelf.

However the points Viola and Barna make are substantial enough to warrant some serious consideration. The tone is a tad polemic for my liking, but if you are in an established church and willing to be confronted with some pretty challenging stuff about the origins of our much loved rituals and practices then I’d encourage you to read it.

An email from the PC crew today reported that the book has generated a lot of heat to the point of some maybe even holding book burnings. The email then goes on to ask people to buy up big and create support for the book and its message. This email left me cold.

If the book has currency then it will stand on its own two feet. If it doesn’t then it ought to fall. In my observation any time someone sets out to malign and persecute a minority group they only succeed in drawing attention to them and advancing their cause. Chill out PC crew. Let your work be its own advocate.

Share

God Next Door III – The Shape of Suburban Communities

Chapter 2 is entitled ‘A suburban state of mind – suburbia and the private life’

Simon begins by reminding us that suburbia used to be the domain of the privileged few who could move out and escape the city, but more recently suburban living has become synonomous with “dull monotony, political conformity and cultural inferiority”. I must admit it is easy to speak disparagingly of suburbia with its blandness and often shallow approach to life. And yet, part of the reason I find myself so intrigued by this subject, is that this is where the vast majority of us live.

For better or worse we have chosen to live in the suburbs when we could make other choices… Which makes me wonder, do those who lament suburbia, really do so, or does it just make us sound cool if we complain?…

Having said that, there is ‘suburbia and suburbia’. The 3 different suburbs I have spent most of my life in are vastly different. Scarborough has almost an urban feel with the redevelopment that has taken place, the crowded unit developments along the beachfront and the diverse kinds of people living there. By contrast Lesmurdie is the last suburb before you hit bush and for that reason feels semi rural in places. Ironically it is much closer to the city than where we are now in Brighton, but the landscape says ‘country’. Lesmurdie has something of a village feel but it is extremely homogenous in population as well as having a vibe of superiority at times. That might be the wrong word (and I’m sure some Lesmurdieites reading this won’t like it described that way), but I think there is an air about the place that stands apart from the rest of the city. Then there’s Brighton (actual suburb name is Butler) that is a new estate and brings with it all the energy and dramas of that scenario. Each has its beauties and challenges.

Simon writes about how privacy has become a primary concern for suburbanites. He says ‘the critics argue that we’ve gradually moved from a collective privacy to an individual privacy or what’s been dubbed privatopia’. In our own estate we see some attempts to reverse this with much land given to common areas and community events being provided by the developer. Streets are zoned in older grid like fashion and footpaths are everywhere. This is by contrast with the older suburbs next door where a maze of convoluted cul de sacs mean that you are only ever going to see your immediate neighbours and any passing traffic is likely accidental or unwanted. These suburbs have been acknowledged as ‘design errors’ and it seems unlikely we will be going ack there again!

As mentioned before, the front porch has been replaced by the alfresco area and now entertaining is done out back. ‘Privatopia’ is a good word for how we live. Given you can get home from work open the remote garage door and enter the house by the garage entry door you really can avoid ever having to mix with neighbours.

On the issue of privatopia Simon writes: “Indeed there has been a definite shift from the house in community to the house as private territory. According to the critics, the result is a suburban culture that values the defining of personal boundaries over the nurturing of relationships.”

What’s also interesting is the size and type of houses being built. Clive Hamilton in Affluenza writes that the average Oz home has increased 30% in the last 20 years. It just seems foolish to build a home under 200sqm now! I mean if you go to sell it, who would but it?!! This was a real consideration for us as we built up here. We wanted to make sure we built something that someone would want at a later date. (This economic / resale issue makes the idea of ‘out front’ living areas problematic.)

The various covenants that accompany new estates have the effect of limiting people’s creativity and innovation. Houses all must look alike to some degree and part of that is driven by economic factors. But it does make for a rather drab streetscape. One of the suburbs near us is ‘Quinns Rock’ an area that used to be a holiday village but with development catching up it has been swallowed up into suburbia. There is now ‘old Quinns’ and ‘new Quinns’, with the ‘old’ being a wonderfully diverse collection of houses from the 60’s onwards usually on big blocks of land.

house.jpg

I noticed this house the other day and really liked its vibe, but there’s no way we could build it in Butler…

I wonder what it does to a community when people are compelled to live by certain covenants and required to conform to various standards? I wonder if it actually drains some of the creativity out of the people? Then again most are too busy to be creative anyway.

I’d like to move across to Old Quinns with its eclectic assortment of houses, winding streets and rural vibe, but then that’d mean leaving our own backyard…

Share